In the realm of Identity Governance and Administration (IGA), two primary strategies stand out: the Lifecycle Approach and the Governance Approach. Each strategy offers distinct advantages, depending on your organization’s goals—whether prioritizing operational efficiency through automation or maintaining rigorous compliance and control.
Lifecycle Approach: Optimizing Access Management
The Lifecycle Approach centers on automating user access management throughout their journey within your organization. From onboarding to offboarding, this method alleviates the workload on IT staff by automating the assignment and revocation of access permissions, ensuring that users have appropriate access at each stage of their involvement.
This approach is particularly beneficial for organizations with dynamic personnel changes, such as large enterprises or government agencies. A notable example is VDAB, Belgium’s public employment service, which implemented a Lifecycle-based IGA system to streamline access management. By automating these processes, VDAB not only improved operational efficiency but also enhanced security by minimizing the risks associated with outdated access permissions lingering in their system.
Governance Approach: Focusing on Compliance and Oversight
In contrast, the Governance Approach emphasizes strict control and monitoring of access permissions. This method is crucial for industries with stringent regulatory requirements, such as finance and healthcare. By ensuring that every access permission is meticulously tracked and auditable, organizations can meet compliance standards and navigate audits with ease.
Beyond simply meeting audit requirements, this approach also enhances real-world information security by enforcing infosec best practices throughout the organization. By integrating these controls into everyday operations, companies ensure that security protocols are not only documented but actively applied.
For instance, an investment bank adopted a Governance-centric IGA solution to maintain detailed oversight of access rights. This system provided comprehensive visibility, allowing them to respond quickly to audits and compliance checks, thus reducing the time and resources typically required for these activities, while also improving the overall security posture of the organization.
Determining the Best Fit for Your Organization
While each approach offers unique strengths, they are not mutually exclusive. Many organizations benefit from integrating aspects of both strategies to optimize their IGA framework. Automation can streamline governance processes, while robust governance structures can enhance the effectiveness of automation.
For a deeper understanding of how these strategies can be customized to meet your organization’s specific needs, download our whitepaper. It provides detailed case studies and practical insights that will help you navigate the complexities of IGA.
Whitepaper
The IS4U Approach to Identity Governance Administration
Your roadmap to robust cybersecurity and compliance.
Learn from practical case studies and expert insights.
